Here is a preliminary analysis of the federal budget by CHRC.
|
1. General
Government spending is up by some 11%, the largest increase in recent memory. The most significant increase is in health spending. These increases implement the previously announced First Ministers Accord. Other major increases include the military, the child tax benefit, day care, and programs for Aboriginal people.
2. Direct Research Costs
Funding for the three granting councils is to be increased by a total of $125m in each of the next three years. CIHR will get $55m a year, NSERC will get $55m a year, and SSHRC will get $15m a year. This is approximately a 10% increase each year on current base budgets. Genome Canada has been allocated an additional $75m specifically for medical genetics.
3. Indirect Costs
The indirect costs program has been made a permanent program. $225 million has been allocated for each of the next three years. The program is to be evaluated in year three, with particular attention to the impact of the program on the increased commercialization of research.
4. Infrastructure
CFI has been allocated an additional $500m to support infrastructure costs of research-intensive hospitals. The money has been allocated over the next four years.
5. Other Budget Provisions
There are several other important budget initiatives that relate to health research: 1) our colleagues at the Rick Hansen Foundation will receive $15m over seven years to support research on spinal cord injuries (congratulations to Rick and Greg Latham who have worked hard over many years to secure this support), 2) the graduate scholarship program is being expanded to include 4,000 more scholarships for master's and doctoral level students at a cost of some $100m. At present, the allocation is 60% to the SSHRC community, 30% to the NSERC community, and 10% to the CIHR community-we will have to work to see if we can change this allocation, 3) a patient safety institute (medical errors, drug interactions, etc.) is being established with $50m of funding over five years, 4) $190m has been allocated over 5 years for regulatory reform and, in particular, to improve the approval process for new drugs, and 5) the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation has received $25m over ten years to develop an executive training program.
There was no budget allocation for the proposed Health Innovation Council (Henry Freisen, Aubrey Tingle, Public Policy Forum, et. al.). This initiative will likely be considered in next year's budget.
DISCUSSION
The allocation for CIHR is not what we had hoped for, but it is not unexpected given the tone of our discussions with politicians and bureaucrats this year. However, I am advised by CIHR that a number of steps can be taken to manage this allocation, at least in the coming year. CIHR feels the allocation should allow for the funding of just about all the proposals that have been rated at "4" or above. Success rates should edge up from about 24% to about 27%. In addition, the allocation to each of the Institutes for strategic initiatives should about double to $5m. It appears there may be a bigger "crunch" in 2004-2005, but we have a year to work on increasing the allocation.
Last year's budget provided affirmative action for CIHR-CIHR's increase was about 15%, while the increases for the other granting councils was half that amount. This year, all three granting councils received the same proportional increases and the budget plan calls for the same approach in years two and three. We are going to have to probe deeper to see what is behind the decisions this year and what we have to do to make a special case for CIHR in the future. If the granting councils are now seen to be in lock step, we might have to promote special initiatives (as opposed to core budget increases) as a way to secure increases for CIHR in the future. The lower than hoped for dollars in CIHR's budget is offset somewhat by other budget initiatives, including the scholarship program-an initiative that was not expected. If we can work to increase the allocation of funds from this program to CIHR, this could help to support existing and new human resources development programs within CIHR.
The budget introduces multi-year funding for the granting councils. This is precedent setting, entirely reasonable, and something we had pushed hard for.
The Deputy Minister of Health is offering a detailed briefing tomorrow afternoon. If there is anything new that comes out of this meeting, I will be back in touch with you. |